Secure Release Engineering: Signatures, Provenance, and Artifact Trust from Build to Deploy

16-12-2025, 16:52

Learn how to secure your release pipeline with signatures, provenance, and artifact trust. A guide for DevOps teams to prevent supply chain attacks.

Secure Release Engineering: Signatures, Provenance, and Artifact Trust from Build to Deploy

In the old days of software delivery, "trust" was implied. You built the binary on a trusted machine, copied it to a floppy disk or a secure server, and installed it. The chain of custody was short, visible, and human. Today, that chain is long, automated, and incredibly opaque. A single commit might trigger a build process that pulls dependencies from three different public registries, runs on a dynamic cloud agent, and pushes a container image to a registry halfway across the world.

If you cannot mathematically prove that the artifact running in production is the exact same one your build server created, you have a problem. This is the domain of secure release engineering. It is no longer enough to scan for vulnerabilities; you must now verify identity.

Supply chain attacks like SolarWinds and Codecov demonstrated that attackers don't need to hack your production servers if they can just hack your build process. By injecting malicious code before the software is ever signed or deployed, they bypass traditional defenses. To counter this, modern DevOps teams are turning to three core concepts: signatures, provenance, and artifact trust.

The Chain of Custody Problem

Imagine shipping a high-value package. You wouldn't just throw it in a generic box and hope for the best. You would seal it with tamper-evident tape, track its location at every hop, and require a signature upon delivery. Software delivery requires the exact same rigor.

Currently, many CI/CD pipelines operate on blind faith. The deployment orchestrator pulls an image tagged v1.2.0 and runs it. But how does it know that v1.2.0 wasn't overwritten by an attacker five minutes ago? Without cryptographic verification, tags are just mutable labels, not guarantees of integrity.

This is where ci cd security tools come into play. They help you move from "implicit trust" (assuming the artifact is safe because it came from your registry) to "explicit trust" (verifying the artifact's digital signature before allowing it to run).

Digital Signatures: Sealing the Box

The first step in securing release engineering is signing your work. Digital signatures provide non-repudiation and integrity. If a single bit of the binary changes after it was signed, the signature becomes invalid.

In the container world, tools like Cosign (part of the Sigstore project) have revolutionized this process. Unlike traditional GPG signing, which required managing complex private keys, modern "keyless" signing uses ephemeral keys tied to OpenID Connect identities.

Here is how it works in practice:

The Build: Your CI runner builds the container image.

The Sign: The runner authenticates (proving it is the legitimate build agent) and signs the image digest.

The Verify: Your Kubernetes cluster or deployment agent checks this signature against the public key transparency log. If the signature matches, the image runs. If not, the deployment is blocked.

This ensures that only code built by your authorized pipelines can ever reach production. It effectively kills the "rogue developer" or "compromised credential" attack vector where someone pushes a malicious image directly to the registry from a laptop.

Provenance: The Ingredients Label

Signatures tell you who signed the artifact, but they don't tell you how it was made. This is where provenance comes in. Think of provenance as the ingredients label and manufacturing log for your software.

A provenance attestation answers critical questions:

Which Git commit triggered this build?

What arguments were passed to the compiler?

Which dependencies (and versions) were pulled in?

When and where did the build happen?

Standards like SLSA (Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts) provide a framework for generating and verifying this data. By attaching a provenance attestation to your artifact, you enable powerful policy checks. For example, you could enforce a rule that says: "Only deploy images that were built from the main branch of our verified GitHub repository."

According to the Linux Foundation, adopting SLSA standards is becoming a critical differentiator for enterprises looking to harden their software supply chain against sophisticated tampering.

Artifact Trust: The Policy Gate

Having signatures and provenance is useless if nobody checks them. The final piece of the puzzle is the admission controller or policy gate. This is the bouncer at the door of your production environment.

In a Kubernetes environment, this is often handled by tools like Open Policy Agent (OPA) or Kyverno. These tools sit in the deployment path and evaluate every request against your trust policies.

A robust policy might look like this:

Rule 1: Reject any image that is not signed by our CI/CD key.

Rule 2: Reject any image older than 30 days (forcing regular rebuilds and patching).

Rule 3: Reject any image that lacks a provenance attestation linking it to a known source repository.

This automated enforcement removes human error. It ensures that even if an attacker compromises a developer's credentials, they cannot manually deploy a backdoor because their laptop cannot generate the valid cryptographic signature required by the cluster.

Building Trust into the Culture

Implementing secure release engineering is not just a tooling upgrade; it is a cultural shift. It requires developers to treat the build pipeline as a production system.

Start small. You don't need to reach SLSA Level 4 overnight.

Start with Signing: Implement image signing for your most critical services.

Generate SBOMs: Start generating Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs) for every build to understand your dependencies.

Enforce in Non-Prod: Turn on verification in your staging environment first. Break things there, not in production.

As noted by Google's security team, the goal is to make the secure path the easy path. When the build system automatically handles signing and attestation, developers don't need to become cryptography experts; they just need to write code.

By weaving signatures and provenance into the fabric of your CI/CD process, you build a system where trust is not assumed - it is proven, every single time.

 


Foto i treść: materiał partnera



Artykuł może zawierać linki partnerów, umożliwiające rozwój serwisu i dostarczanie darmowych treści.

Ostatnie artykuły:

fot. Freepik




fot. Freepik



fot. nensuria